Before
you even try to read my next post, please study this one carefully.
Put the message in your [mental] pocket. To take it out once in a while to play with it. So you will
get to understand and know it.
I
used http://dictionary.reverso.net/english-definition/
to compare three verbs that are not as much alike as they seem at
first glance.
to look underscores were placed by JoAnne Lakefield
4
copula
to
give the impression
of being by appearance to the eye or mind; seem that
looks interesting
12
tr
to
accord
in appearance with (something)
to look one's age
to watch
to see [sees, seeing, saw, seen]
1
to perceive with the eyes
2
when
tr, may take a clause as object to
perceive
(an idea) mentally; understand I
explained the problem but he could not see it
4
tr; may
take a clause as object to
be aware
of in advance; foresee I
can see what will happen if you don't help
5
when
tr, may take a clause as object to
ascertain
or find out (a fact); learn see
who is at the door
6
when
tr, takes a clause as object; when intr, foll by: to
to make
sure (of someth.) or
take care (of someth.) see
that he gets to bed early
7
when
tr, may take a clause as object to
consider, deliberate,
or decide see
if you can come next week
16
(in gambling, esp. in poker) to
match (another player's bet) or match the bet of (another player) by
staking an equal sum
If
I may roughly describe the differences between these three ways of
making use of 'vision', I would do it like this:
The
definition of
looking is
often about guiding either the eyes or view [def. 1, 5 ,11] or the
attention [2, 3, 8a, 9] or even conclusion [3, 4, 12] into a
certain direction.
But
what about result? There are no guarantees: we either hope [6, 7b] or
search [7a, 10], without a note about how it ends. Even having
recourse to something is inconclusive: it means one is able
o make use of something but that doesn't mean he will [8b].
So
looking is definitely directive and suggestive, but it is
inconclusive.
Watching
sounds a lot more careful and aimed at detail, but I
sense something stressed or negative too. It's mostly like keeping an
eye out for danger, for things to be wary of, to make
sure things won't go out of control.
wary: watchful, cautious, or alert; characterized by caution or watchfulness
Seeing
...
now that is beautiful!
It's
about life: about sensing, perceiving and experiencing; physical or
mental [1, 2, 3, 4, 8] or even with an abstract subject [10]
It's
very decisive and includes the outcome [5, 6, 7, 16] or urges you not
to just cast a glance - a look- at something but to study it. To
undergo it !! [15]
I
left out definitions 9, 11, 12, 13 ,14. They are all about seeing a
human being. Let's play with it.
Seeing
is about experiencing or undergoing. Or about doing a thorough in
depth research for a conclusive answer, right. Keep that in mind when
you look at these phrases....
I
cannot stand by and see a child in pain Beauty... we are
obviously sharing the child's pain, we are empathic.
to
see one's solicitor Not for a cup of coffee and a chat, but
for very solid advice
the
Prime Minister will see the deputation now Again: not for a
cup of coffee and a chat
she
is seeing a married man ...
Is
she looking at a married man? We all like to look at beauty, right.
No harm in that.
Is
she watching a married man? Is she afraid of him, or does she suspect
him of a misdemeanor and wants to catch him at it?
No,
she is 'experiencing' him. They are sharing some special part of their
lives....
I
saw her to the door now that's a funny one. Isn't it enough to
direct someone to the door? The indecisive directing as in looking.
“I looked her to the door” :))
No,
I saw her to the door.... because I wanted to make sure she would
leave!! Not a very sympathetic expression. But some people just ask
for being seen to the door.
Cameras,
our mechanical eyes...
How
do these things relate to our three verbs?
The easiest one is
watching...
can we use camera's for watching ? Definitely, they are called
security
cameras.
Can
we use a camera for looking?
Oh yes we can. It is the type of photography I'm not keen on. Just
place a sound-activated camera in a crowd, like at a party, and it
turns directed by the noise... or cameras with facial recognition
technology. These cameras decide when and or how to make the shot of
the subject they 'pick'. And snap... it
makes a shot. Rather snappy. The outcome might be nice, but 9 out of
10 (999 out of 1000?) it will not be really worth while. Yup, that is
looking : it has both directing and uncertainty about the
outcome.
Now
for the prize word: can we use a camera for seeing?
What a question, that's the ultimate use of a camera. Seeing is an
art word, photography is [or can be] an art.
Where
most people look, or watch, or even scrutinize, a photographer may
see something that the others overlooked, failed to see. The
photographer uses his camera to emphasize or explain what it was that he saw.
The photo may help us, overlookers, to focus and we might perceive
the 'unobvious' too. If we take care to really study the photo, let it
sink in...
Like
I try to pass along ideas, visions and feelings with words, a
photographer uses his pictures...
Is
being a 'visual
thinker' or 'picture thinker' a prerequisite to being a good
photographer?